Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Zhibek Kulambayeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W L L
Form
L L W L W W L W W LHead To Head: Nugroho 2 - 0 Kulambayeva
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nugroho winning 4 and Kulambayeva winning 0. The last match between Nugroho and Kulambayeva was at the W50 Navi Mumbai, 20-12-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Priska Madelyn Nugroho getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Priska Madelyn Nugroho | 2 |
| Zhibek Kulambayeva | 0 |
W50 Navi Mumbai(20-12-2024)
| Nugroho | Stats | Kulambayeva |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (7-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 310 | Ranking | 314 |
| 265 | Highest Rank | 309 |
| 21 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 5 |
| 65% (125-68) | Career Total W/L | 55% (224-183) |
| $5,160 | Career Prize Money | $2,140 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nugroho VS Kulambayeva H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(7) |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Nugroho VS Kulambayeva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 16 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:56:38 | Average Match Time | 1:56:38 |
| 72% (114/158) | 1st Serve % | 78% (113/144) |
| 72% (82/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (63/113) |
| 43% (19/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 35% (7/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 44% (64/144) | Return Points Win % | 36% (57/158) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Priska Madelyn Nugroho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve %
64%
(
16 of
25)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
19
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Cherry Kim
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Junhan Zhang
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Jiho Shin
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Lina Glushko
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
81%
(
78 of
96)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhibek Kulambayeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
47%
(
42 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Arina Bulatova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Wushuang Zheng
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(4) 6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiia Sobolieva
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
77%
(
34 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (125/68) | Win/Loss | 55% (224/183) |
| 62% (262/158) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (493/431) |
| 56% (2113/1655) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4335/4094) |
| 66% (112/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (54/68) |
| 59% (13/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (157/95) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39% (13/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 410 | Aces Total | 237 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 380 | Total Double Faults | 1408 |
| 1:37:1 | Average Match Time | 1:35:54 |
| 434.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 503.36 |
| 63% (7222/11473) | 1st Serve % | 68% (17070/25070) |
| 65% (4694/7222) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (9748/17070) |
| 48% (2024/4251) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3451/8000) |
| 51% (744/1461) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1694/3294) |
| 47% (5329/11306) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11919/24777) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (57/34) | Challenger W/L | 50% (95/95) |
| 69% (62/28) | Futures W/L | 61% (128/83) |
| 65% (120/186) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (219/402) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (17/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (36/70) |
| 57% (23/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (63/113) |
| 93% (121/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (215/182) |
| 7% (121/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (215/33) |
| 17% (71/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (192/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
